Dominican Republic vs Philippines: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Dominican Republic
88.2%
in 2019
Philippines
88.3%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
92nd
Philippines rank
91st
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 88.3% against 88.2% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 92nd and Philippines ranks 91st of 191 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.9% | 72.1% | 13.9% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 89.5% | 82.5% | 7.0% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Dominican Republic or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 88.3% against 88.2% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Dominican Republic and Philippines?
- 0.1%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Philippines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Philippines rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 92nd and Philippines ranks 91st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.