Equatorial Guinea vs India: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
79.4%
in 2019
India
79.9%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
123rd
India rank
121st
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 79.9% against 79.4% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 123rd and India ranks 121st of 191 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.6% | 0.0% | 79.6% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 79.5% | 15.2% | 64.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Equatorial Guinea or India?
- India, at 79.9% against 79.4% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Equatorial Guinea and India?
- 0.5%, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and India?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and India rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 123rd and India ranks 121st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.