Equatorial Guinea vs Republic of Korea: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
79.4%
in 2019
Republic of Korea
78.2%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
123rd
Republic of Korea rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 79.4% against 78.2% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 123rd and Republic of Korea ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.6% | 77.8% | 1.7% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 79.5% | 78.3% | 1.1% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Republic of Korea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 79.4% against 78.2% in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Republic of Korea?
- 1.2%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Republic of Korea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Republic of Korea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 123rd and Republic of Korea ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.