Ethiopia vs Palestine, State of: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Ethiopia
37.1%
in 2019
Palestine, State of
36.5%
in 2019
Ethiopia rank
172nd
Palestine, State of rank
173rd
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Ethiopia
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 37.1% against 36.5% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 172nd and Palestine, State of ranks 173rd of 191 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.6% | 0.0% | 10.6% | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 29.9% | 12.2% | 17.8% | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Ethiopia or Palestine, State of?
- Ethiopia, at 37.1% against 36.5% in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Ethiopia and Palestine, State of?
- 0.6%, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Palestine, State of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Ethiopia ranks 172nd and Palestine, State of ranks 173rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.