France vs Republic of Moldova: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
France
80.4%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
81.6%
in 2019
France rank
119th
Republic of Moldova rank
117th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- France
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 81.6% against 80.4% in France, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was France ahead.
France ranks 119th and Republic of Moldova ranks 117th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.4% | 67.9% | 23.6% | France |
| 2010s | 79.1% | 85.5% | 6.4% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, France or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 81.6% against 80.4% in France as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between France and Republic of Moldova?
- 1.2%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Republic of Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do France and Republic of Moldova rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- France ranks 119th and Republic of Moldova ranks 117th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.