Guatemala vs Mozambique: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Guatemala
69.7%
in 2019
Mozambique
69.9%
in 2019
Guatemala rank
141st
Mozambique rank
140th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Guatemala
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 69.9% against 69.7% in Guatemala, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 141st and Mozambique ranks 140th of 191 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.4% | 40.3% | 0.9% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 60.5% | 65.5% | 5.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Guatemala or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 69.9% against 69.7% in Guatemala as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Guatemala and Mozambique?
- 0.2%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mozambique?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Mozambique rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Guatemala ranks 141st and Mozambique ranks 140th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.