Indonesia vs Republic of Korea: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Indonesia
77.4%
in 2019
Republic of Korea
78.2%
in 2019
Indonesia rank
126th
Republic of Korea rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Indonesia
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 78.2% against 77.4% in Indonesia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Indonesia ranks 126th and Republic of Korea ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.9% | 77.8% | 18.9% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 74.1% | 78.3% | 4.2% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Indonesia or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 78.2% against 77.4% in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Indonesia and Republic of Korea?
- 0.8%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Republic of Korea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Republic of Korea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Indonesia ranks 126th and Republic of Korea ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.