Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Mozambique: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Iran, Islamic Republic of
68.7%
in 2019
Mozambique
69.9%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
142nd
Mozambique rank
140th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 69.9% against 68.7% in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 142nd and Mozambique ranks 140th of 191 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.7% | 40.3% | 21.5% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 56.7% | 65.5% | 8.9% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 69.9% against 68.7% in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Mozambique?
- 1.2%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Mozambique?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Mozambique rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 142nd and Mozambique ranks 140th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.