Japan vs East Timor: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Japan
97.4%
in 2019
East Timor
97.3%
in 2019
Japan rank
28th
East Timor rank
29th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Japan
- East Timor
How they compare
Japan currently reports 97.4% against 97.3% in East Timor, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 28th and East Timor ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.2% | 94.3% | 3.8% | Japan |
| 2010s | 97.4% | 98.0% | 0.5% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Japan or East Timor?
- Japan, at 97.4% against 97.3% in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Japan and East Timor?
- 0.1%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Japan and East Timor rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Japan ranks 28th and East Timor ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.