Micronesia (country) vs Norway: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Micronesia (country)
97.1%
in 2019
Norway
97.1%
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
32nd
Norway rank
33rd
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Norway
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 97.1% against 97.1% in Norway, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Norway ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 32nd and Norway ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.9% | 97.1% | 1.2% | Norway |
| 2010s | 97.1% | 97.3% | 0.3% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Micronesia (country) or Norway?
- Micronesia (country), at 97.1% against 97.1% in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Micronesia (country) and Norway?
- 0.0%, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Norway?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Norway rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 32nd and Norway ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.