Micronesia (country) vs East Timor: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Micronesia (country)
97.1%
in 2019
East Timor
97.3%
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
32nd
East Timor rank
29th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 97.3% against 97.1% in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 32nd and East Timor ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia (country) averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.9% | 94.3% | 1.6% | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 97.1% | 98.0% | 0.9% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Micronesia (country) or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 97.3% against 97.1% in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Micronesia (country) and East Timor?
- 0.2%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and East Timor rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 32nd and East Timor ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.