Moldova vs Netherlands: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Moldova
81.6%
in 2019
Netherlands
81.8%
in 2019
Moldova rank
117th
Netherlands rank
116th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Moldova
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 81.8% against 81.6% in Moldova, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Netherlands ahead.
Moldova ranks 117th and Netherlands ranks 116th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.9% | 82.5% | 14.6% | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 85.5% | 80.7% | 4.7% | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Moldova or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 81.8% against 81.6% in Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Moldova and Netherlands?
- 0.2%, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Netherlands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Moldova and Netherlands rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Moldova ranks 117th and Netherlands ranks 116th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.