Republic of Moldova vs Nigeria: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Republic of Moldova
81.6%
in 2019
Nigeria
79.9%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
117th
Nigeria rank
120th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Nigeria
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 81.6% against 79.9% in Nigeria, a difference of 1.7%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 117th and Nigeria ranks 120th of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.9% | 0.0% | 67.9% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 85.5% | 20.5% | 64.9% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Republic of Moldova or Nigeria?
- Republic of Moldova, at 81.6% against 79.9% in Nigeria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Republic of Moldova and Nigeria?
- 1.7%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Nigeria?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Nigeria rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 117th and Nigeria ranks 120th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.