Namibia vs United Arab Emirates: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Namibia
89.8%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
89.2%
in 2019
Namibia rank
83rd
United Arab Emirates rank
85th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Namibia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 89.8% against 89.2% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Namibia ranks 83rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 85th of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.7% | 89.5% | 24.8% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 85.4% | 89.1% | 3.8% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Namibia or United Arab Emirates?
- Namibia, at 89.8% against 89.2% in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Namibia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.6%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Namibia ranks 83rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.