Netherlands vs North Macedonia: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Netherlands
81.8%
in 2019
North Macedonia
82.3%
in 2019
Netherlands rank
116th
North Macedonia rank
114th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Netherlands
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 82.3% against 81.8% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 116th and North Macedonia ranks 114th of 191 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.5% | 57.6% | 24.9% | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 80.7% | 67.8% | 12.9% | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Netherlands or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 82.3% against 81.8% in Netherlands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Netherlands and North Macedonia?
- 0.5%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Netherlands and North Macedonia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Netherlands ranks 116th and North Macedonia ranks 114th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.