North Macedonia vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
North Macedonia
82.3%
in 2019
Tunisia
83.0%
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
114th
Tunisia rank
111th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 83.0% against 82.3% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 114th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.6% | 54.6% | 3.0% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 67.8% | 80.2% | 12.4% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, North Macedonia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 83.0% against 82.3% in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between North Macedonia and Tunisia?
- 0.7%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Tunisia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 114th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.