North Macedonia vs Türkiye: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
North Macedonia
82.3%
in 2019
Türkiye
82.0%
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
114th
Türkiye rank
115th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Türkiye
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 82.3% against 82.0% in Türkiye, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 114th and Türkiye ranks 115th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.6% | 36.1% | 21.5% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 67.8% | 71.7% | 4.0% | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, North Macedonia or Türkiye?
- North Macedonia, at 82.3% against 82.0% in Türkiye as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between North Macedonia and Türkiye?
- 0.3%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Türkiye?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Türkiye rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 114th and Türkiye ranks 115th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.