Papua New Guinea vs Paraguay: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Papua New Guinea
94.6%
in 2019
Paraguay
94.5%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
51st
Paraguay rank
52nd
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 94.6% against 94.5% in Paraguay, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 51st and Paraguay ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.4% | 79.1% | 1.4% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 90.5% | 90.6% | 0.1% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Papua New Guinea or Paraguay?
- Papua New Guinea, at 94.6% against 94.5% in Paraguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Papua New Guinea and Paraguay?
- 0.1%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Paraguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Paraguay rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 51st and Paraguay ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.