Papua New Guinea vs Russian Federation: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Papua New Guinea
94.6%
in 2019
Russian Federation
94.6%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
51st
Russian Federation rank
50th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 94.6% against 94.6% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 51st and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.4% | 60.7% | 19.7% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 90.5% | 89.4% | 1.1% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Papua New Guinea or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 94.6% against 94.6% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 0.0%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 51st and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.