Papua New Guinea vs United Kingdom: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Papua New Guinea
94.6%
in 2019
United Kingdom
94.6%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
51st
United Kingdom rank
49th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 94.6% against 94.6% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 51st and United Kingdom ranks 49th of 191 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.4% | 94.9% | 14.4% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 90.5% | 94.2% | 3.7% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Papua New Guinea or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 94.6% against 94.6% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom?
- 0.0%, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 51st and United Kingdom ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.