Paraguay vs Russian Federation: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Paraguay
94.5%
in 2019
Russian Federation
94.6%
in 2019
Paraguay rank
52nd
Russian Federation rank
50th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Paraguay
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 94.6% against 94.5% in Paraguay, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 52nd and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.1% | 60.7% | 18.4% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 90.6% | 89.4% | 1.2% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Paraguay or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 94.6% against 94.5% in Paraguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Paraguay and Russian Federation?
- 0.1%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Paraguay and Russian Federation rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Paraguay ranks 52nd and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.