Philippines vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Philippines
88.3%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
89.0%
in 2019
Philippines rank
91st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
88th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Philippines
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 89.0% against 88.3% in Philippines, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 91st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.1% | 85.5% | 13.4% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 82.5% | 88.0% | 5.5% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Philippines or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 89.0% against 88.3% in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Philippines and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.7%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Philippines ranks 91st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.