Qatar vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Qatar
99.7%
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
99.4%
in 2019
Qatar rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
4th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Qatar
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 99.7% against 99.4% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 4th of 191 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.8% | 99.5% | 0.3% | Qatar |
| 2010s | 99.7% | 99.3% | 0.5% | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Qatar or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Qatar, at 99.7% against 99.4% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.3%, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Qatar ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 4th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.