Romania vs South Africa: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Romania
90.2%
in 2019
South Africa
90.5%
in 2019
Romania rank
81st
South Africa rank
79th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Romania
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 90.5% against 90.2% in Romania, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 81st and South Africa ranks 79th of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.6% | 88.2% | 1.7% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 87.5% | 90.3% | 2.8% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Romania or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 90.5% against 90.2% in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Romania and South Africa?
- 0.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Romania ranks 81st and South Africa ranks 79th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.