Samoa vs United States of America: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Samoa
96.2%
in 2019
United States of America
96.4%
in 2019
Samoa rank
40th
United States of America rank
38th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Samoa
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 96.4% against 96.2% in Samoa, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United States of America ahead.
Samoa ranks 40th and United States of America ranks 38th of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.5% | 98.6% | 2.2% | United States of America |
| 2010s | 96.2% | 96.3% | 0.1% | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Samoa or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 96.4% against 96.2% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Samoa and United States of America?
- 0.2%, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and United States of America?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and United States of America rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Samoa ranks 40th and United States of America ranks 38th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.