Saudi Arabia vs South Africa: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Saudi Arabia
90.7%
in 2019
South Africa
90.5%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
77th
South Africa rank
79th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- South Africa
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 90.7% against 90.5% in South Africa, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 77th and South Africa ranks 79th of 191 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.7% | 88.2% | 8.4% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 91.0% | 90.3% | 0.7% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Saudi Arabia or South Africa?
- Saudi Arabia, at 90.7% against 90.5% in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Saudi Arabia and South Africa?
- 0.2%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and South Africa rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 77th and South Africa ranks 79th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.