Sierra Leone vs Solomon Islands: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Sierra Leone
0.0%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
1.6%
in 2019
Sierra Leone rank
178th
Solomon Islands rank
177th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Sierra Leone
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 1.6% against 0.0% in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 178th and Solomon Islands ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 4.4% | 0.2% | 4.3% | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Sierra Leone or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 1.6% against 0.0% in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands?
- 1.6%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Sierra Leone ranks 178th and Solomon Islands ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.