Saint Lucia vs Timor-Leste: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Saint Lucia
97.5%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
97.3%
in 2019
Saint Lucia rank
26th
Timor-Leste rank
29th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Saint Lucia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 97.5% against 97.3% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 26th and Timor-Leste ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.4% | 94.3% | 1.0% | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 96.5% | 98.0% | 1.4% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Saint Lucia or Timor-Leste?
- Saint Lucia, at 97.5% against 97.3% in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Saint Lucia and Timor-Leste?
- 0.2%, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Timor-Leste?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Lucia and Timor-Leste rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Saint Lucia ranks 26th and Timor-Leste ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.