Saint Lucia vs Viet Nam: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Saint Lucia
97.5%
in 2019
Viet Nam
97.4%
in 2019
Saint Lucia rank
26th
Viet Nam rank
27th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Saint Lucia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 97.5% against 97.4% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Saint Lucia ranks 26th and Viet Nam ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.4% | 93.5% | 1.8% | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 96.5% | 95.8% | 0.7% | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Saint Lucia or Viet Nam?
- Saint Lucia, at 97.5% against 97.4% in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Saint Lucia and Viet Nam?
- 0.1%, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Viet Nam?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Lucia and Viet Nam rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Saint Lucia ranks 26th and Viet Nam ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.