Syrian Arab Republic vs Yemen: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Syrian Arab Republic
0.0%
in 2019
Yemen
0.0%
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic rank
178th
Yemen rank
178th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Yemen
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Yemen, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 178th and Yemen ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.7% | 91.1% | 67.4% | Yemen |
| 2010s | 14.6% | 57.0% | 42.4% | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Syrian Arab Republic or Yemen?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Yemen as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Syrian Arab Republic and Yemen?
- 0.0%, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Yemen?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Yemen rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 178th and Yemen ranks 178th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.