Palestine, State of vs Zimbabwe: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Palestine, State of
36.5%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
37.1%
in 2019
Palestine, State of rank
173rd
Zimbabwe rank
171st
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Palestine, State of
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 37.1% against 36.5% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Palestine, State of ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Palestine, State of averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palestine, State of | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 71.9% | 71.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 12.2% | 10.6% | 1.6% | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Palestine, State of or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 37.1% against 36.5% in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Palestine, State of and Zimbabwe?
- 0.6%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palestine, State of and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Palestine, State of and Zimbabwe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Palestine, State of ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.