Angola vs Botswana: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Angola
69.71
in 2014
Botswana
70
in 2014
Angola rank
76th
Botswana rank
74th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Angola
  • Botswana
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 70 against 69.71 in Angola, a difference of 0.29.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Botswana ahead.

Angola ranks 76th and Botswana ranks 74th of 181 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 55.83 51.97 3.86 Angola
2010s 69.15 60.3 8.84 Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Angola or Botswana?
Botswana, at 70 against 69.71 in Angola as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Angola and Botswana?
0.29, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Botswana?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Angola and Botswana rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Angola ranks 76th and Botswana ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.