Argentina vs Sierra Leone: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Argentina
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 40.64 against 38.42 in Argentina, a difference of 2.22.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 165th and Sierra Leone ranks 163rd of 181 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.57 | 21.75 | 20.82 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 38.23 | 36.41 | 1.82 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Argentina or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 40.64 against 38.42 in Argentina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Argentina and Sierra Leone?
- 2.22, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Sierra Leone?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and Sierra Leone rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Argentina ranks 165th and Sierra Leone ranks 163rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.