Armenia vs Palau: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Armenia
67.09
in 2014
Palau
66.71
in 2014
Armenia rank
88th
Palau rank
89th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Armenia
  • Palau
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 67.09 against 66.71 in Palau, a difference of 0.38.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palau ahead.

Armenia ranks 88th and Palau ranks 89th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Palau Difference Ahead
2000s 46.64 64.01 17.36 Palau
2010s 64.66 64.18 0.4756 Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Armenia or Palau?
Armenia, at 67.09 against 66.71 in Palau as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Armenia and Palau?
0.38, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Palau?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Armenia and Palau rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Armenia ranks 88th and Palau ranks 89th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.