Bhutan vs Italy: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Bhutan
63
in 2014
Italy
63.04
in 2014
Bhutan rank
107th
Italy rank
105th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bhutan
  • Italy
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Italy currently reports 63.04 against 63 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.04.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 107th and Italy ranks 105th of 181 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Italy Difference Ahead
2000s 59.12 63.53 4.42 Italy
2010s 62.3 62.96 0.66 Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Bhutan or Italy?
Italy, at 63.04 against 63 in Bhutan as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Bhutan and Italy?
0.04, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Italy?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bhutan and Italy rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Bhutan ranks 107th and Italy ranks 105th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.