Bhutan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bhutan
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 63.27 against 63 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.27.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 183 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.12 | 63.27 | 4.15 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 62.3 | 63.26 | 0.9648 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Bhutan or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 63.27 against 63 in Bhutan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.27, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Bhutan ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.