Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Cambodia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 35.87 against 35.54 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.33.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cambodia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 172nd and Cambodia ranks 173rd of 184 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.76 | 44.76 | 23 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 33.3 | 39.16 | 5.87 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cambodia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 35.87 against 35.54 in Cambodia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
- 0.33, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 172nd and Cambodia ranks 173rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.