Burkina Faso vs Montenegro: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Montenegro
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 62.18 against 62.06 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 110th and Montenegro ranks 112th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.46 | 37.2 | 2.74 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 59.05 | 44.44 | 14.61 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Montenegro?
- Burkina Faso, at 62.18 against 62.06 in Montenegro as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Montenegro?
- 0.12, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Montenegro?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Montenegro rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 110th and Montenegro ranks 112th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.