Chile vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Chile
- Tunisia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 71.77 against 71.54 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tunisia ahead.
Chile ranks 57th and Tunisia ranks 59th of 181 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.26 | 65.68 | 4.42 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 69.63 | 70.66 | 1.03 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Chile or Tunisia?
- Chile, at 71.77 against 71.54 in Tunisia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Chile and Tunisia?
- 0.23, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tunisia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Chile and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Chile ranks 57th and Tunisia ranks 59th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.