Colombia vs Kyrgyzstan: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Colombia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 66.25 against 65.92 in Colombia, a difference of 0.33.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 94th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 92nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.32 | 33.33 | 24.99 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 64.62 | 66.93 | 2.31 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Colombia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 66.25 against 65.92 in Colombia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Colombia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.33, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Colombia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Colombia ranks 94th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 92nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.