Congo, Dem. Rep. vs Ethiopia: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Congo, Dem. Rep.
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Congo, Dem. Rep. currently reports 47.62 against 45.52 in Ethiopia, a difference of 2.1.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 153rd and Ethiopia ranks 156th of 181 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Dem. Rep. | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.87 | 55.05 | 14.18 | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 53.62 | 62.18 | 8.56 | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Congo, Dem. Rep. or Ethiopia?
- Congo, Dem. Rep., at 47.62 against 45.52 in Ethiopia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Congo, Dem. Rep. and Ethiopia?
- 2.1, with Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Dem. Rep. and Ethiopia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Congo, Dem. Rep. and Ethiopia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 153rd and Ethiopia ranks 156th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.