Costa Rica vs Guatemala: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Guatemala
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 69.7 against 69.61 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 77th and Guatemala ranks 78th of 183 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.38 | 39.61 | 14.77 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 62.43 | 60.04 | 2.39 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Costa Rica or Guatemala?
- Costa Rica, at 69.7 against 69.61 in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Costa Rica and Guatemala?
- 0.09, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guatemala?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Costa Rica and Guatemala rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 77th and Guatemala ranks 78th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.