Cyprus vs Jordan: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Cyprus
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 61.71 against 60.7 in Cyprus, a difference of 1.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 120th and Jordan ranks 117th of 181 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.36 | 48.66 | 11.69 | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 60.93 | 59.12 | 1.81 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 61.71 against 60.7 in Cyprus as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Jordan?
- 1.01, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Jordan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Cyprus and Jordan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Cyprus ranks 120th and Jordan ranks 117th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.