Cyprus vs Vanuatu: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Cyprus
60.7
in 2014
Vanuatu
59.62
in 2014
Cyprus rank
120th
Vanuatu rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cyprus
  • Vanuatu
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 60.7 against 59.62 in Vanuatu, a difference of 1.08.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Cyprus ranks 120th and Vanuatu ranks 123rd of 181 countries.

Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 60.36 79.49 19.13 Vanuatu
2010s 60.93 66.94 6.01 Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Vanuatu?
Cyprus, at 60.7 against 59.62 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Vanuatu?
1.08, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Vanuatu?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Cyprus and Vanuatu rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Cyprus ranks 120th and Vanuatu ranks 123rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.