Denmark vs Hong Kong: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Denmark
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 89.84 against 88.29 in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.55.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 2nd and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.59 | 64.77 | 26.82 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 90.83 | 88.28 | 2.55 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Denmark or Hong Kong?
- Denmark, at 89.84 against 88.29 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Denmark and Hong Kong?
- 1.55, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Denmark and Hong Kong rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Denmark ranks 2nd and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.