Dominican Republic vs Ecuador: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 70.88 against 70.54 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Ecuador ranks 68th of 181 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.72 | 68.32 | 2.61 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 68.94 | 70.18 | 1.25 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Dominican Republic or Ecuador?
- Dominican Republic, at 70.88 against 70.54 in Ecuador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 0.34, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ecuador rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Ecuador ranks 68th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.