Ecuador vs Iraq: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Ecuador
70.54
in 2014
Iraq
70.81
in 2014
Ecuador rank
68th
Iraq rank
66th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Iraq
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 70.81 against 70.54 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.27.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 68th and Iraq ranks 66th of 181 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 68.32 69.86 1.54 Iraq
2010s 70.18 70.47 0.2852 Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Ecuador or Iraq?
Iraq, at 70.81 against 70.54 in Ecuador as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Ecuador and Iraq?
0.27, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iraq?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Ecuador and Iraq rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Ecuador ranks 68th and Iraq ranks 66th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.