Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 71.54 against 71.2 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 62nd and Tunisia ranks 59th of 181 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.19 | 65.68 | 5.5 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 71.19 | 70.66 | 0.5349 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 71.54 against 71.2 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
- 0.34, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 62nd and Tunisia ranks 59th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.