Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 76.06 against 75.86 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.2.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th of 184 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.54 | 61.77 | 13.77 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 75.54 | 73.92 | 1.62 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 76.06 against 75.86 in Eswatini as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.2, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.