Fiji vs Namibia: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Fiji
74.57
in 2014
Namibia
74.46
in 2014
Fiji rank
44th
Namibia rank
45th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Fiji
  • Namibia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 74.57 against 74.46 in Namibia, a difference of 0.11.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.

Fiji ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 45th of 181 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 76.61 67.47 9.14 Fiji
2010s 74.51 73.35 1.15 Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Fiji or Namibia?
Fiji, at 74.57 against 74.46 in Namibia as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Fiji and Namibia?
0.11, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Namibia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Fiji and Namibia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Fiji ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 45th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.